NAU publications by CHER
Faculty & staff publications
NAU faculty and staff have the opportunity to publish their findings and knowledge as authors. CHER has many researchers that have been cited multiple times in major publications for their great work. The Center for Health Equity Research has accumulated all faculty publications into one, easy to navigate database.
Please type in a key word or author LAST name to search
Coulter K., Sabo Martínez Chisholm Gonzalez Bass Zavala Villalobos Garcia Levy Slack S D K K S E D T J A Study and Analysis of the Treatment of Mexican Unaccompanied Minors by Customs and Border Protection Journal Article Journal on Migration and Human Security, 2020. @article{Coulter2020, title = {A Study and Analysis of the Treatment of Mexican Unaccompanied Minors by Customs and Border Protection}, author = {Coulter, K., Sabo, S., Martínez, D., Chisholm, K., Gonzalez, K., Bass Zavala, S., Villalobos E., Garcia D. Levy, T., Slack, J.}, url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2331502420915898}, doi = {10.1177/2331502420915898}, year = {2020}, date = {2020-04-22}, journal = {Journal on Migration and Human Security}, abstract = {The routine human rights abuses and due process violations of unaccompanied alien children (UAC) by US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) have contributed to a mounting humanitarian and legal crisis along the US–Mexico border. In the United States, the treatment of UAC is governed by laws, policies, and standards drawn from the Flores Settlement, the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), and CBP procedures and directives, which are intended to ensure UAC’s protection, well-being, and ability to pursue relief from removal, such as asylum. As nongovernmental organizations and human rights groups have documented, however, CBP has repeatedly violated these legal standards and policies, and subjected UAC to abuses and rights violations. This article draws from surveys of 97 recently deported Mexican UAC, which examine their experiences with US immigration authorities. The study finds that Mexican UAC are detained in subpar conditions, are routinely not screened for fear of return to their home countries or for human trafficking, and are not sufficiently informed about the deportation process. The article recommends that CBP should take immediate steps to improve the treatment of UAC, that CBP and other entities responsible for the care of UAC be monitored to ensure their compliance with US law and policy, and that Mexican UAC be afforded the same procedures and protection under the TVPRA as UAC from noncontiguous states.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } The routine human rights abuses and due process violations of unaccompanied alien children (UAC) by US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) have contributed to a mounting humanitarian and legal crisis along the US–Mexico border. In the United States, the treatment of UAC is governed by laws, policies, and standards drawn from the Flores Settlement, the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), and CBP procedures and directives, which are intended to ensure UAC’s protection, well-being, and ability to pursue relief from removal, such as asylum. As nongovernmental organizations and human rights groups have documented, however, CBP has repeatedly violated these legal standards and policies, and subjected UAC to abuses and rights violations. This article draws from surveys of 97 recently deported Mexican UAC, which examine their experiences with US immigration authorities. The study finds that Mexican UAC are detained in subpar conditions, are routinely not screened for fear of return to their home countries or for human trafficking, and are not sufficiently informed about the deportation process. The article recommends that CBP should take immediate steps to improve the treatment of UAC, that CBP and other entities responsible for the care of UAC be monitored to ensure their compliance with US law and policy, and that Mexican UAC be afforded the same procedures and protection under the TVPRA as UAC from noncontiguous states. |
Sabo, Samantha; Champion, Catalina Denman; Bell, Melanie L; Vucovich, Elsa Cornejo; Ingram, Maia; Valencia, Celina; del Vasquez, Maria Carmen Castro; Gonzalez-Fagoaga, Eduardo; de Zapien, Jill Geurnsey; Rosales, Cecilia B Meta Salud Diabetes study protocol: A cluster-randomized trial to reduce cardiovascular risk among a diabetic population of Mexico Journal Article BMJ Open, 8 (3), 2018. @article{Sabo2018, title = {Meta Salud Diabetes study protocol: A cluster-randomized trial to reduce cardiovascular risk among a diabetic population of Mexico}, author = {Samantha Sabo and Catalina Denman Champion and Melanie L Bell and Elsa Cornejo Vucovich and Maia Ingram and Celina Valencia and Maria Carmen Castro del Vasquez and Eduardo Gonzalez-Fagoaga and Jill Geurnsey de Zapien and Cecilia B Rosales}, url = {https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/8/3/e020762.full.pdf}, doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020762}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-03-12}, journal = {BMJ Open}, volume = {8}, number = {3}, abstract = {Introduction Northern Mexico has among the highest rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes in the world. This research addresses core gaps in implementation science to develop, test and scale-up CVD risk-reduction interventions in diabetics through a national primary care health system. Methods and analysis The Meta Salud Diabetes (MSD) research project is a parallel two-arm cluster-randomized clinical behavioral trial based in 22 (n=22) health centers in Sonora, Mexico. MSD aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the MSD intervention for the secondary prevention of CVD risk factors among a diabetic population (n=320) compared with the study control of usual care. The MSD intervention consists of 2-hour class sessions delivered over a 13-week period providing educational information to encourage sustainable behavioral change to prevent disease complications including the adoption of physical activity. MSD is delivered within the context of Mexico’s national primary care health centre system by health professionals, including nurses, physicians and community health workers via existing social support groups for individuals diagnosed with chronic disease. Mixed models are used to estimate the effect of MSD by comparing cardiovascular risk, as measured by the Framingham Risk Score, between the trial arms. Secondary outcomes include hypertension, behavioral risk factors and psychosocial factors. Ethics and dissemination This work is supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (1R01HL125996-01) and approved by the University of Arizona Research Institutional Review Board (Protocol 1508040144) and the Research Bioethics Committee at the University of Sonora. The first Internal Review Board approval date was 31 August 2015 with five subsequent approved amendments. This article refers to protocol V.0.2, dated 30 January 2017. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and presentation at international conferences and will be shared through meetings with health systems officials.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Introduction Northern Mexico has among the highest rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes in the world. This research addresses core gaps in implementation science to develop, test and scale-up CVD risk-reduction interventions in diabetics through a national primary care health system. Methods and analysis The Meta Salud Diabetes (MSD) research project is a parallel two-arm cluster-randomized clinical behavioral trial based in 22 (n=22) health centers in Sonora, Mexico. MSD aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the MSD intervention for the secondary prevention of CVD risk factors among a diabetic population (n=320) compared with the study control of usual care. The MSD intervention consists of 2-hour class sessions delivered over a 13-week period providing educational information to encourage sustainable behavioral change to prevent disease complications including the adoption of physical activity. MSD is delivered within the context of Mexico’s national primary care health centre system by health professionals, including nurses, physicians and community health workers via existing social support groups for individuals diagnosed with chronic disease. Mixed models are used to estimate the effect of MSD by comparing cardiovascular risk, as measured by the Framingham Risk Score, between the trial arms. Secondary outcomes include hypertension, behavioral risk factors and psychosocial factors. Ethics and dissemination This work is supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (1R01HL125996-01) and approved by the University of Arizona Research Institutional Review Board (Protocol 1508040144) and the Research Bioethics Committee at the University of Sonora. The first Internal Review Board approval date was 31 August 2015 with five subsequent approved amendments. This article refers to protocol V.0.2, dated 30 January 2017. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and presentation at international conferences and will be shared through meetings with health systems officials. |
Ortega, María Isabel; Sabo, Samantha; Gallegos, Patricia Aranda; Zapien, Jill Eileen Guernsey De; Zapien, Antonio; Abril, Gloria Elena Portillo; Rosales, Cecilia Agribusiness, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Health of Agricultural Migrant Workers Journal Article Frontiers in Public Health, 4 (54), pp. 1-10, 2016. @article{Ortega2016, title = {Agribusiness, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Health of Agricultural Migrant Workers}, author = {María Isabel Ortega and Samantha Sabo and Patricia Aranda Gallegos and Jill Eileen Guernsey De Zapien and Antonio Zapien and Gloria Elena Portillo Abril and Cecilia Rosales}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27066471}, doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2016.00054}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-03-29}, journal = {Frontiers in Public Health}, volume = {4}, number = {54}, pages = {1-10}, abstract = {BACKGROUND: Living conditions and health of migrant farmworkers could benefit from a health promotion model based on corporate social responsibility (CSR). OBJECTIVE: To understand how Mexican agribusiness owners and general managers view and practice CSR. METHODS: We interviewed 8 agribusiness owners/managers and 233 farmworkers using open-ended interviews and gathered anthropometrical data of 133 children from farmworkers families. To guide our analysis and discussion, we followed the two-dimension model of CSR proposed by Quazi and O'Brien. RESULTS: According to interviewee responses, mean percentage of agreement with CSR concept was 77.4%, with a range of 54-85.7%. Main health-related issues among farmworkers were infectious diseases, crowding, and access to health-care services; there were acute cases of undernutrition among farmworkers' children and diets were of poor quality. DISCUSSION: Agribusiness owners and managers understand and practice CSR according to a wide and modern view, which contradicts with farmworkers' living conditions and health. Quazi and O'Brien model should consider the social context, in which it is analyzed, and the social manifestations of community development as a tool for further analysis on the perceptions and actions of entrepreneurs.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } BACKGROUND: Living conditions and health of migrant farmworkers could benefit from a health promotion model based on corporate social responsibility (CSR). OBJECTIVE: To understand how Mexican agribusiness owners and general managers view and practice CSR. METHODS: We interviewed 8 agribusiness owners/managers and 233 farmworkers using open-ended interviews and gathered anthropometrical data of 133 children from farmworkers families. To guide our analysis and discussion, we followed the two-dimension model of CSR proposed by Quazi and O'Brien. RESULTS: According to interviewee responses, mean percentage of agreement with CSR concept was 77.4%, with a range of 54-85.7%. Main health-related issues among farmworkers were infectious diseases, crowding, and access to health-care services; there were acute cases of undernutrition among farmworkers' children and diets were of poor quality. DISCUSSION: Agribusiness owners and managers understand and practice CSR according to a wide and modern view, which contradicts with farmworkers' living conditions and health. Quazi and O'Brien model should consider the social context, in which it is analyzed, and the social manifestations of community development as a tool for further analysis on the perceptions and actions of entrepreneurs. |
2020 |
Coulter K., Sabo Martínez Chisholm Gonzalez Bass Zavala Villalobos Garcia Levy Slack S D K K S E D T J A Study and Analysis of the Treatment of Mexican Unaccompanied Minors by Customs and Border Protection Journal Article Journal on Migration and Human Security, 2020. @article{Coulter2020, title = {A Study and Analysis of the Treatment of Mexican Unaccompanied Minors by Customs and Border Protection}, author = {Coulter, K., Sabo, S., Martínez, D., Chisholm, K., Gonzalez, K., Bass Zavala, S., Villalobos E., Garcia D. Levy, T., Slack, J.}, url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2331502420915898}, doi = {10.1177/2331502420915898}, year = {2020}, date = {2020-04-22}, journal = {Journal on Migration and Human Security}, abstract = {The routine human rights abuses and due process violations of unaccompanied alien children (UAC) by US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) have contributed to a mounting humanitarian and legal crisis along the US–Mexico border. In the United States, the treatment of UAC is governed by laws, policies, and standards drawn from the Flores Settlement, the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), and CBP procedures and directives, which are intended to ensure UAC’s protection, well-being, and ability to pursue relief from removal, such as asylum. As nongovernmental organizations and human rights groups have documented, however, CBP has repeatedly violated these legal standards and policies, and subjected UAC to abuses and rights violations. This article draws from surveys of 97 recently deported Mexican UAC, which examine their experiences with US immigration authorities. The study finds that Mexican UAC are detained in subpar conditions, are routinely not screened for fear of return to their home countries or for human trafficking, and are not sufficiently informed about the deportation process. The article recommends that CBP should take immediate steps to improve the treatment of UAC, that CBP and other entities responsible for the care of UAC be monitored to ensure their compliance with US law and policy, and that Mexican UAC be afforded the same procedures and protection under the TVPRA as UAC from noncontiguous states.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } The routine human rights abuses and due process violations of unaccompanied alien children (UAC) by US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) have contributed to a mounting humanitarian and legal crisis along the US–Mexico border. In the United States, the treatment of UAC is governed by laws, policies, and standards drawn from the Flores Settlement, the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), and CBP procedures and directives, which are intended to ensure UAC’s protection, well-being, and ability to pursue relief from removal, such as asylum. As nongovernmental organizations and human rights groups have documented, however, CBP has repeatedly violated these legal standards and policies, and subjected UAC to abuses and rights violations. This article draws from surveys of 97 recently deported Mexican UAC, which examine their experiences with US immigration authorities. The study finds that Mexican UAC are detained in subpar conditions, are routinely not screened for fear of return to their home countries or for human trafficking, and are not sufficiently informed about the deportation process. The article recommends that CBP should take immediate steps to improve the treatment of UAC, that CBP and other entities responsible for the care of UAC be monitored to ensure their compliance with US law and policy, and that Mexican UAC be afforded the same procedures and protection under the TVPRA as UAC from noncontiguous states. |
2018 |
Sabo, Samantha; Champion, Catalina Denman; Bell, Melanie L; Vucovich, Elsa Cornejo; Ingram, Maia; Valencia, Celina; del Vasquez, Maria Carmen Castro; Gonzalez-Fagoaga, Eduardo; de Zapien, Jill Geurnsey; Rosales, Cecilia B Meta Salud Diabetes study protocol: A cluster-randomized trial to reduce cardiovascular risk among a diabetic population of Mexico Journal Article BMJ Open, 8 (3), 2018. @article{Sabo2018, title = {Meta Salud Diabetes study protocol: A cluster-randomized trial to reduce cardiovascular risk among a diabetic population of Mexico}, author = {Samantha Sabo and Catalina Denman Champion and Melanie L Bell and Elsa Cornejo Vucovich and Maia Ingram and Celina Valencia and Maria Carmen Castro del Vasquez and Eduardo Gonzalez-Fagoaga and Jill Geurnsey de Zapien and Cecilia B Rosales}, url = {https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/8/3/e020762.full.pdf}, doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020762}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-03-12}, journal = {BMJ Open}, volume = {8}, number = {3}, abstract = {Introduction Northern Mexico has among the highest rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes in the world. This research addresses core gaps in implementation science to develop, test and scale-up CVD risk-reduction interventions in diabetics through a national primary care health system. Methods and analysis The Meta Salud Diabetes (MSD) research project is a parallel two-arm cluster-randomized clinical behavioral trial based in 22 (n=22) health centers in Sonora, Mexico. MSD aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the MSD intervention for the secondary prevention of CVD risk factors among a diabetic population (n=320) compared with the study control of usual care. The MSD intervention consists of 2-hour class sessions delivered over a 13-week period providing educational information to encourage sustainable behavioral change to prevent disease complications including the adoption of physical activity. MSD is delivered within the context of Mexico’s national primary care health centre system by health professionals, including nurses, physicians and community health workers via existing social support groups for individuals diagnosed with chronic disease. Mixed models are used to estimate the effect of MSD by comparing cardiovascular risk, as measured by the Framingham Risk Score, between the trial arms. Secondary outcomes include hypertension, behavioral risk factors and psychosocial factors. Ethics and dissemination This work is supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (1R01HL125996-01) and approved by the University of Arizona Research Institutional Review Board (Protocol 1508040144) and the Research Bioethics Committee at the University of Sonora. The first Internal Review Board approval date was 31 August 2015 with five subsequent approved amendments. This article refers to protocol V.0.2, dated 30 January 2017. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and presentation at international conferences and will be shared through meetings with health systems officials.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Introduction Northern Mexico has among the highest rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes in the world. This research addresses core gaps in implementation science to develop, test and scale-up CVD risk-reduction interventions in diabetics through a national primary care health system. Methods and analysis The Meta Salud Diabetes (MSD) research project is a parallel two-arm cluster-randomized clinical behavioral trial based in 22 (n=22) health centers in Sonora, Mexico. MSD aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the MSD intervention for the secondary prevention of CVD risk factors among a diabetic population (n=320) compared with the study control of usual care. The MSD intervention consists of 2-hour class sessions delivered over a 13-week period providing educational information to encourage sustainable behavioral change to prevent disease complications including the adoption of physical activity. MSD is delivered within the context of Mexico’s national primary care health centre system by health professionals, including nurses, physicians and community health workers via existing social support groups for individuals diagnosed with chronic disease. Mixed models are used to estimate the effect of MSD by comparing cardiovascular risk, as measured by the Framingham Risk Score, between the trial arms. Secondary outcomes include hypertension, behavioral risk factors and psychosocial factors. Ethics and dissemination This work is supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (1R01HL125996-01) and approved by the University of Arizona Research Institutional Review Board (Protocol 1508040144) and the Research Bioethics Committee at the University of Sonora. The first Internal Review Board approval date was 31 August 2015 with five subsequent approved amendments. This article refers to protocol V.0.2, dated 30 January 2017. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and presentation at international conferences and will be shared through meetings with health systems officials. |
2016 |
Ortega, María Isabel; Sabo, Samantha; Gallegos, Patricia Aranda; Zapien, Jill Eileen Guernsey De; Zapien, Antonio; Abril, Gloria Elena Portillo; Rosales, Cecilia Agribusiness, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Health of Agricultural Migrant Workers Journal Article Frontiers in Public Health, 4 (54), pp. 1-10, 2016. @article{Ortega2016, title = {Agribusiness, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Health of Agricultural Migrant Workers}, author = {María Isabel Ortega and Samantha Sabo and Patricia Aranda Gallegos and Jill Eileen Guernsey De Zapien and Antonio Zapien and Gloria Elena Portillo Abril and Cecilia Rosales}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27066471}, doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2016.00054}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-03-29}, journal = {Frontiers in Public Health}, volume = {4}, number = {54}, pages = {1-10}, abstract = {BACKGROUND: Living conditions and health of migrant farmworkers could benefit from a health promotion model based on corporate social responsibility (CSR). OBJECTIVE: To understand how Mexican agribusiness owners and general managers view and practice CSR. METHODS: We interviewed 8 agribusiness owners/managers and 233 farmworkers using open-ended interviews and gathered anthropometrical data of 133 children from farmworkers families. To guide our analysis and discussion, we followed the two-dimension model of CSR proposed by Quazi and O'Brien. RESULTS: According to interviewee responses, mean percentage of agreement with CSR concept was 77.4%, with a range of 54-85.7%. Main health-related issues among farmworkers were infectious diseases, crowding, and access to health-care services; there were acute cases of undernutrition among farmworkers' children and diets were of poor quality. DISCUSSION: Agribusiness owners and managers understand and practice CSR according to a wide and modern view, which contradicts with farmworkers' living conditions and health. Quazi and O'Brien model should consider the social context, in which it is analyzed, and the social manifestations of community development as a tool for further analysis on the perceptions and actions of entrepreneurs.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } BACKGROUND: Living conditions and health of migrant farmworkers could benefit from a health promotion model based on corporate social responsibility (CSR). OBJECTIVE: To understand how Mexican agribusiness owners and general managers view and practice CSR. METHODS: We interviewed 8 agribusiness owners/managers and 233 farmworkers using open-ended interviews and gathered anthropometrical data of 133 children from farmworkers families. To guide our analysis and discussion, we followed the two-dimension model of CSR proposed by Quazi and O'Brien. RESULTS: According to interviewee responses, mean percentage of agreement with CSR concept was 77.4%, with a range of 54-85.7%. Main health-related issues among farmworkers were infectious diseases, crowding, and access to health-care services; there were acute cases of undernutrition among farmworkers' children and diets were of poor quality. DISCUSSION: Agribusiness owners and managers understand and practice CSR according to a wide and modern view, which contradicts with farmworkers' living conditions and health. Quazi and O'Brien model should consider the social context, in which it is analyzed, and the social manifestations of community development as a tool for further analysis on the perceptions and actions of entrepreneurs. |