NAU publications by CHER
Faculty & staff publications
NAU faculty and staff have the opportunity to publish their findings and knowledge as authors. CHER has many researchers that have been cited multiple times in major publications for their great work. The Center for Health Equity Research has accumulated all faculty publications into one, easy to navigate database.
Please type in a key word or author LAST name to search
Ingram, Maia; Sabo, Samantha; Gomez, Sofia; Piper, Rosalinda; de Zapien, Jill Guernsey; Reinschmidt, Kerstin M; Schachter, Ken A; Carvajal, Scott C Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 9 (1), pp. 49-56, 2015. @article{Ingram2015, title = {Taking a community-based participatory research approach in the development of methods to measure a community health worker community advocacy intervention}, author = {Maia Ingram and Samantha Sabo and Sofia Gomez and Rosalinda Piper and Jill Guernsey de Zapien and Kerstin M Reinschmidt and Ken A Schachter and Scott C Carvajal}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25981424}, doi = {10.1353/cpr.2015.0001}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-01}, journal = {Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action}, volume = {9}, number = {1}, pages = {49-56}, abstract = {BACKGROUND: Public health advocacy is by necessity responsive to shifting sociopolitical climates, and thus a challenge of advocacy research is that the intervention must by definition be adaptive. Moving beyond the classification of advocacy efforts to measurable indicators and outcomes of policy, therefore, requires a dynamic research approach. OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this article are to (1) describe use of the CBPR approach in the development and measurement of a community health worker (CHW) intervention designed to engage community members in public health advocacy and (2) provide a model for application of this approach in advocacy interventions addressing community-level systems and environmental change. METHODS: The Kingdon three streams model of policy change provided a theoretical framework for the intervention. Research and community partners collaboratively identified and documented intervention data. We describe five research methods used to monitor and measure CHW advocacy activities that both emerged from and influenced intervention activities. DISCUSSION: Encounter forms provided a longitudinal perspective of how CHWs engaged in advocacy activities in the three streams. Strategy maps defined desired advocacy outcomes and health benefits. Technical assistance notes identified and documented intermediate outcomes. Focus group and interview data reflected CHW efforts to engage community members in advocacy and the development of community leaders. APPLICATION OF LESSONS LEARNED: We provide a model for application of key principles of CPBR that are vital to effectively capturing the overarching and nuanced aspects of public health advocacy work in dynamic political and organizational environments.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } BACKGROUND: Public health advocacy is by necessity responsive to shifting sociopolitical climates, and thus a challenge of advocacy research is that the intervention must by definition be adaptive. Moving beyond the classification of advocacy efforts to measurable indicators and outcomes of policy, therefore, requires a dynamic research approach. OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this article are to (1) describe use of the CBPR approach in the development and measurement of a community health worker (CHW) intervention designed to engage community members in public health advocacy and (2) provide a model for application of this approach in advocacy interventions addressing community-level systems and environmental change. METHODS: The Kingdon three streams model of policy change provided a theoretical framework for the intervention. Research and community partners collaboratively identified and documented intervention data. We describe five research methods used to monitor and measure CHW advocacy activities that both emerged from and influenced intervention activities. DISCUSSION: Encounter forms provided a longitudinal perspective of how CHWs engaged in advocacy activities in the three streams. Strategy maps defined desired advocacy outcomes and health benefits. Technical assistance notes identified and documented intermediate outcomes. Focus group and interview data reflected CHW efforts to engage community members in advocacy and the development of community leaders. APPLICATION OF LESSONS LEARNED: We provide a model for application of key principles of CPBR that are vital to effectively capturing the overarching and nuanced aspects of public health advocacy work in dynamic political and organizational environments. |
Ingram, Maia; Schachter, Ken A; Sabo, Samantha; Reinschmidt, Kerstin M; Gomez, Sofia; Zapien, Jill Guernsey De; Carvajal, Scott C A community health worker intervention to address the social determinants of health through policy change Journal Article The Journal of primary Prevention, 35 (2), pp. 119-123, 2014. @article{Ingram2014, title = {A community health worker intervention to address the social determinants of health through policy change}, author = {Maia Ingram and Ken A Schachter and Samantha Sabo and Kerstin M Reinschmidt and Sofia Gomez and Jill Guernsey De Zapien and Scott C Carvajal}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24363179}, doi = {10.1007/s10935-013-0335-y}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-04-01}, journal = {The Journal of primary Prevention}, volume = {35}, number = {2}, pages = {119-123}, abstract = {Public policy that seeks to achieve sustainable improvements in the social determinants of health, such as income, education, housing, food security and neighborhood conditions, can create positive and sustainable health effects. This paper describes preliminary results of Acción para la Salud, a public health intervention in which Community health workers (CHWs) from five health agencies engaged their community in the process of making positive systems and environmental changes. Academic-community partners trained Acción CHWs in community advocacy and provided ongoing technical assistance in developing strategic advocacy plans. The CHWs documented community advocacy activities through encounter forms in which they identified problems, formulated solutions, and described systems and policy change efforts. Strategy maps described the steps of the advocacy plans. Findings demonstrate that CHWs worked to initiate discussions about underlying social determinants and environment-related factors that impact health, and identified solutions to improve neighborhood conditions, create community opportunities, and increase access to services.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Public policy that seeks to achieve sustainable improvements in the social determinants of health, such as income, education, housing, food security and neighborhood conditions, can create positive and sustainable health effects. This paper describes preliminary results of Acción para la Salud, a public health intervention in which Community health workers (CHWs) from five health agencies engaged their community in the process of making positive systems and environmental changes. Academic-community partners trained Acción CHWs in community advocacy and provided ongoing technical assistance in developing strategic advocacy plans. The CHWs documented community advocacy activities through encounter forms in which they identified problems, formulated solutions, and described systems and policy change efforts. Strategy maps described the steps of the advocacy plans. Findings demonstrate that CHWs worked to initiate discussions about underlying social determinants and environment-related factors that impact health, and identified solutions to improve neighborhood conditions, create community opportunities, and increase access to services. |
2015 |
Ingram, Maia; Sabo, Samantha; Gomez, Sofia; Piper, Rosalinda; de Zapien, Jill Guernsey; Reinschmidt, Kerstin M; Schachter, Ken A; Carvajal, Scott C Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 9 (1), pp. 49-56, 2015. @article{Ingram2015, title = {Taking a community-based participatory research approach in the development of methods to measure a community health worker community advocacy intervention}, author = {Maia Ingram and Samantha Sabo and Sofia Gomez and Rosalinda Piper and Jill Guernsey de Zapien and Kerstin M Reinschmidt and Ken A Schachter and Scott C Carvajal}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25981424}, doi = {10.1353/cpr.2015.0001}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-01}, journal = {Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action}, volume = {9}, number = {1}, pages = {49-56}, abstract = {BACKGROUND: Public health advocacy is by necessity responsive to shifting sociopolitical climates, and thus a challenge of advocacy research is that the intervention must by definition be adaptive. Moving beyond the classification of advocacy efforts to measurable indicators and outcomes of policy, therefore, requires a dynamic research approach. OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this article are to (1) describe use of the CBPR approach in the development and measurement of a community health worker (CHW) intervention designed to engage community members in public health advocacy and (2) provide a model for application of this approach in advocacy interventions addressing community-level systems and environmental change. METHODS: The Kingdon three streams model of policy change provided a theoretical framework for the intervention. Research and community partners collaboratively identified and documented intervention data. We describe five research methods used to monitor and measure CHW advocacy activities that both emerged from and influenced intervention activities. DISCUSSION: Encounter forms provided a longitudinal perspective of how CHWs engaged in advocacy activities in the three streams. Strategy maps defined desired advocacy outcomes and health benefits. Technical assistance notes identified and documented intermediate outcomes. Focus group and interview data reflected CHW efforts to engage community members in advocacy and the development of community leaders. APPLICATION OF LESSONS LEARNED: We provide a model for application of key principles of CPBR that are vital to effectively capturing the overarching and nuanced aspects of public health advocacy work in dynamic political and organizational environments.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } BACKGROUND: Public health advocacy is by necessity responsive to shifting sociopolitical climates, and thus a challenge of advocacy research is that the intervention must by definition be adaptive. Moving beyond the classification of advocacy efforts to measurable indicators and outcomes of policy, therefore, requires a dynamic research approach. OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this article are to (1) describe use of the CBPR approach in the development and measurement of a community health worker (CHW) intervention designed to engage community members in public health advocacy and (2) provide a model for application of this approach in advocacy interventions addressing community-level systems and environmental change. METHODS: The Kingdon three streams model of policy change provided a theoretical framework for the intervention. Research and community partners collaboratively identified and documented intervention data. We describe five research methods used to monitor and measure CHW advocacy activities that both emerged from and influenced intervention activities. DISCUSSION: Encounter forms provided a longitudinal perspective of how CHWs engaged in advocacy activities in the three streams. Strategy maps defined desired advocacy outcomes and health benefits. Technical assistance notes identified and documented intermediate outcomes. Focus group and interview data reflected CHW efforts to engage community members in advocacy and the development of community leaders. APPLICATION OF LESSONS LEARNED: We provide a model for application of key principles of CPBR that are vital to effectively capturing the overarching and nuanced aspects of public health advocacy work in dynamic political and organizational environments. |
2014 |
Ingram, Maia; Schachter, Ken A; Sabo, Samantha; Reinschmidt, Kerstin M; Gomez, Sofia; Zapien, Jill Guernsey De; Carvajal, Scott C A community health worker intervention to address the social determinants of health through policy change Journal Article The Journal of primary Prevention, 35 (2), pp. 119-123, 2014. @article{Ingram2014, title = {A community health worker intervention to address the social determinants of health through policy change}, author = {Maia Ingram and Ken A Schachter and Samantha Sabo and Kerstin M Reinschmidt and Sofia Gomez and Jill Guernsey De Zapien and Scott C Carvajal}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24363179}, doi = {10.1007/s10935-013-0335-y}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-04-01}, journal = {The Journal of primary Prevention}, volume = {35}, number = {2}, pages = {119-123}, abstract = {Public policy that seeks to achieve sustainable improvements in the social determinants of health, such as income, education, housing, food security and neighborhood conditions, can create positive and sustainable health effects. This paper describes preliminary results of Acción para la Salud, a public health intervention in which Community health workers (CHWs) from five health agencies engaged their community in the process of making positive systems and environmental changes. Academic-community partners trained Acción CHWs in community advocacy and provided ongoing technical assistance in developing strategic advocacy plans. The CHWs documented community advocacy activities through encounter forms in which they identified problems, formulated solutions, and described systems and policy change efforts. Strategy maps described the steps of the advocacy plans. Findings demonstrate that CHWs worked to initiate discussions about underlying social determinants and environment-related factors that impact health, and identified solutions to improve neighborhood conditions, create community opportunities, and increase access to services.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Public policy that seeks to achieve sustainable improvements in the social determinants of health, such as income, education, housing, food security and neighborhood conditions, can create positive and sustainable health effects. This paper describes preliminary results of Acción para la Salud, a public health intervention in which Community health workers (CHWs) from five health agencies engaged their community in the process of making positive systems and environmental changes. Academic-community partners trained Acción CHWs in community advocacy and provided ongoing technical assistance in developing strategic advocacy plans. The CHWs documented community advocacy activities through encounter forms in which they identified problems, formulated solutions, and described systems and policy change efforts. Strategy maps described the steps of the advocacy plans. Findings demonstrate that CHWs worked to initiate discussions about underlying social determinants and environment-related factors that impact health, and identified solutions to improve neighborhood conditions, create community opportunities, and increase access to services. |