Section 2: Board
Policy 2.01
Topic: Length of service
Date of implementation: June 28, 2008
Revised: August 28, 2012
Read moreNewly
recruited regular board members will have a two-year appointment, renewable for
another two years at the end of the first year. The Human Protections
Coordinator will keep track of Board members’ terms. Board appointment letters
are generated every two years and signed by the Institutional Official or Vice
President for Research.
The
IRB Chair will be appointed by the Institutional Officer or Vice President for
Research with input from the Human Protections Coordinator and current IRB
Chair. The appointment will be for a 2-year commitment, renewable for another
two years. This same policy is in effect for co-Chairs.
Policy 2.02
Topic: Adoption of new members
Date of implementation: April 13, 2009
Revised: August 28, 2012
Read moreAs IRB members cycle off
the board, leave the university, or, for other reasons, step down from the
board, new board members are sought to replace them. Possible new board members
are identified by the Institutional Official, the Chair of the IRB, IRB
members, or the Human Protections Coordinator; or, individuals interested in
serving on the board may contact the IRB. When a potential new board member is
identified, either the Human Protections Coordinator or the IRB Chair contacts
that person to see if he or she would be interested in serving on the board.
That individual then
proceeds though the following steps with an opportunity to discontinue at any
time:
- meet
with Human Protections Coordinator to discuss the responsibilities and activities
of the IRB, the possible start date for serving on the board, and any potential
conflicts of interest;
- submit
a current resume or CV to the IRB;
- take
the CITI tutorials for IRB members (a series of 10 modules) with a pass rate of
80%;
- attend
a board meeting to meet the board, and ask and answer questions.
If the potential board member agrees to serve on
the board and there are no objections from other board members or IRB office
personnel, the board member is accepted onto the board as a regular member.
Policy 2.03
Topic: Training of board members
Date of implementation: April 13, 2009
Revised: August 28, 2012
Read moreAll board members take a
series of 10 modules through the Collaborative Institutional Training
Initiative (CITI), available online at the IRB website. Tutorial completion must
be current within the past 3 years. Board members must re-take the tutorial
upon expiration of the 3-year period. A periodic review of board members is
conducted to let members know when their tutorial is going to expire.
Additional board member
training occurs on an as-needed basis, when the Human Protections Coordinator
prepares a face-to-face training on IRB-related topics such as federal
regulations, confidentiality, assessing risk, informed consent, etc. Continuing
education opportunities also arise within regular board meetings as needed.
Policy 2.04
Topic: Meeting attendance
Date of implementation: July 28, 2008
Read moreAll board members are expected to attend all meetings
throughout the year. If a member expects to not be able to attend a meeting,
the member should arrange for his or her alternate to attend.
If a member misses more than two meetings without an
alternate in attendance during the academic year (August through July), the
member will lose his or her place on the IRB. The IRB Chair or designate will
ask that member to step down from the IRB and the Director, Chair, and IO will
work to find a replacement board member.
The IRB meetings are not open to the public. However, guests
can attend under specific circumstances, such as:
- Investigators whose IRB applications are under full
board review may attend a question-and-answer session during the board meeting
in which their application is discussed. They must leave the meeting when
asked.
- Alternates can attend any part of any meeting
for observation and training purposes when they are not serving as a voting
member at that particular meeting.
- Other guests may attend meetings if arranged in
advance with the Director and Chair. However, they may not sit in during a full
board review discussion.
Policy 2.05
Topic: Policy adoption
Date of implementation: July 28, 2008
Read moreThe steps for adopting new policies by the IRB are as
follows:
- the Human Protections Coordinator brings a draft
policy statement to the board meeting
- the board reviews and discusses the statement, suggesting
changes and revisions
- the board votes on whether or not to adopt the
policy with the changes/revisions in place
- the Human Protections Coordinator brings the
revised board-approved policy to the Institutional Officer (IO)
- The IO either approves the final policy or
requests changes/revisions
- If the IO requests changes/revisions, the Human
Protections Coordinator makes the changes, then sends it by e-mail or delivers
to the board for second vote
- board members can vote by e-mail, telephone, or
in-person to approve the policy
The policy will be adopted by a simple majority vote of any
board quorum. For example, if five members constitute a quorum, a policy can be
adopted with three of those five members present voting aye, or four of six
members voting aye. Alternates may vote on policy items if the board member for
whom they are attending is not present.
Policy 2.06
Topic: Conflict of interest
Date of implementation: April 13, 2009
Read moreConflicts of interest may occur when an IRB member’s responsibilities compete with his or her private or professional interests. Conflicts of interest can be ideological, personal, financial, or professional. Whether actual or potential, conflicts of interest may raise questions concerning IRB members’ objectivity and possible financial gain.
Upon appointment to the IRB, new members must report any actual or potential conflicts of interest. Board members inform the IRB when they are unable to participate in board deliberations due to conflict of interest. Members with conflicts of interest may also be identified by the Human Protections Coordinator, the IRB Chair, or other members.
Board members having a conflict of interest in a specific research project do take part in the IRB deliberations on that protocol; however, they may provide information about the protocol if requested by the IRB. Furthermore, members with a conflict of interest must exit the meeting during the time in which deliberations and voting on the protocol take place.
These policies and related procedures are described here in
compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Part 46.103(b)(4)
and 46.103(b)(5).