Recommendations of the Global Learning Subcommittee of the Task Force on Global Education
As adopted by the Northern Arizona University Faculty Senate
(January 19, 2010)
Please click here for a PDF version of this document.
The Global Learning Subcommittee of the Task Force on Global
Education is one of five subcommittees established after the Task Force was
charged by the President and the Provost in spring, ’08. The charge was to develop recommendations
that would both transform NAU into a global campus and prepare students to
become globally competent graduates. The
subcommittee has taken this charge seriously and has worked diligently with a
group of faculty and staff representing a cross section of all colleges, many disciplines
and departments to develop recommendations that, if implemented, will be truly
transformative in terms of the kind of academic experiences NAU students enjoy and
the kind of graduates they become.
Why Consider These Recommendations and Why Now?
Diversity, environmental sustainability, and global
engagement are values that Northern Arizona University has long endorsed as key
themes in our University mission and strategic planning documents. Since curriculum is the most direct and profound
means by which a university can embody its values, this proposal seeks to build
upon an already rich legacy at NAU of faculty scholarship and programmatic
activity in the areas of diversity, environmental sustainability, and global
These recommendations will result in student learning
opportunities—curricular and cocurricular—that will become ubiquitous for
undergraduates through repeated experiences in both the major and Liberal
Studies. No longer would a single course
be thought sufficient to prepare students for an increasingly globalized and
multicultural world; one in which we face continual challenges to both our
natural environment and to the critical thinking and ethical maturity of any
These recommendations do not sweep aside all of the rich and
vital course work and activity around diversity, environmental sustainability,
and global engagement created in the last several decades at NAU. Rather, these recommendations seek to build
upon this work and practice to expand learning experiences based on these three
elements across the whole of an undergraduate student’s educational
We note that these recommendations are being offered at a
time of great uncertainty at Northern Arizona University. The severity of the budget cuts and the
implications they may have for workload, class sizes and even program viability
may constitute such a significant distraction that faculty may find it
difficult to engage with proposed recommendations affecting the
curriculum. This time of upheaval and
change may, however, provide us with a unique opportunity to visualize how we
can become even more effective in realizing the goals that are core to our
identity as faculty at this institution and in this historical moment. When we cannot control the national or state economies
and when we cannot control decisions over the state budgeting process, it is important
to remember what we can control. We
still control the curriculum, what and how classes are taught, the body of
knowledge, and our aspirations for the character of an NAU college graduate.
From its inception, the global learning subcommittee has
sought to answer three core questions:
- What should be the characteristics of a globally
competent NAU graduate?
- What are the principal global learning outcomes
that students should demonstrate?
- What should be the principal sites in the
curriculum for such learning?
More than forty faculty and co-curricular professionals
representing all colleges and major divisions within the university met
frequently to grapple with these questions (see Appendix B for
membership). These encounters generated
lengthy and substantive conversations about global learning goals. Very early in the process, we agreed that any
definition of global education should go beyond global engagement to also
embrace diversity and environmental sustainability. We felt that these three elements reflect the
agenda of global education in the early 21st century, that they do not stand
alone but are fundamentally interconnected and interdependent, and that our
objectives in advancing global education would be best served by adopting and
infusing them into the curriculum as a package.
It also became clear as the process moved forward that these
three elements were clearly articulated in the seven strategic goals of the
university, that they are ingrained in the principles that govern the liberal
studies program and that they reflect values deeply embedded in the NAU
community and among NAU faculty. In
effect, these three elements are more than simply global learning goals. We have proposed that these three elements
should constitute the basis for the three core University Thematic Student Learning
Outcomes. We are convinced that this
approach to teaching and learning will become the signature experience for
undergraduates at NAU.
University Thematic Student Learning Outcomes
Undergraduates of NAU will become globally competent through
engagement with the University’s curricular and co-curricular programming. To become globally competent, students will
acquire the skills, knowledge, and dispositions to negotiate the increasingly interconnected
and interdependent context of the human condition. At NAU, global competence is
achieved through intentional curricular and co-curricular experiences that
foreground global learning. The
curriculum will provide students with opportunities to learn how their identity
is shaped by their community, their society, and the world. They will also have
opportunities to expand their abilities to interact effectively across cultural
barriers, and communicate in language(s) other than English. These goals will
be achieved through the following three University Thematic Student Learning Outcomes:
Education: Students will learn how to analyze, synthesize, and evaluate the
interconnectedness and interdependence of the human experience on a global scale.
Sustainability: Students will
acquire the skills and knowledge base to understand the importance of and
options for environmental sustainability in local and global terms. Students
will also acquire an understanding of the range of ethical perspectives
concerning the uses of natural resources and the impact of these perspectives
on creating a sustainable relationship to the natural environment.
- Diversity: Students will learn about and critically
reflect upon the nature and consequences of diversity in both the social (e.g.
ethnic, religious, cultural) world and the natural environment, and develop an
understanding of how this diversity both alters and is altered in a world
characterized by increasing global interaction.
Sites for Curricular Infusion
University Thematic Student Learning Outcomes are intended
to touch ALL undergraduate students. It
is for this reason that all undergraduate majors and the Liberal Studies
Program should serve as the primary sites for the infusion of the global
learning goals. In this regarding, we
propose the following:
- That in view of the fact that all undergraduates
have an academic home in at least one department, all departments should take
steps to incorporate learning outcomes related to the thematic goals of global
education, environmental sustainability and diversity into their respective
programs of study.
- That in view of the fact that the Liberal
Studies program offers the one common academic experience for students, the
Liberal Studies student learning outcomes should be reshaped in terms of the
three University Thematic Student Learning Outcomes.
Given the significant differences among the majors in terms
of content and pedagogy, departments would be expected to determine the
strategies best suited to infusing perspectives associated with the three
University Thematic Student Learning Outcomes into their respective
Recommendations from the Global Learning Subcommittee
- That the three elements of NAU’s vision for
global education be adopted as the core University Thematic Student Learning
Outcomes and that these should be part of the learning experience of all
undergraduate students in their undergraduate majors, in the Liberal Studies
Program, and in their co-curricular programming.
- That departments accept and embrace a role in
providing students with substantive and multiple opportunities within their
degree program that includes guiding them through advisement to opportunities
in the University curriculum (including the minor program, the Liberal Studies
Program, Education Abroad, and co-curricular learning experiences) to acquire
knowledge and develop competencies associated with global engagement, diversity
and environmental sustainability.
- That the program review process be used to
facilitate the incorporation of student learning outcomes that reflect the University Thematic Student Learning
Outcomes into the curricula of departments, other academic units, and the Liberal Studies program.
- That in recognition of the transformative nature
of education abroad, that each undergraduate major will explore how best to
allow students the chance to exercise the option of taking one semester of Education
Abroad without slowing progress toward degree completion.
- That the Graduate College engage in a process to
determine how best to infuse graduate education with a global learning agenda.
Appendix ARead more
Core Assumptions and Commitments
- These recommendations offer a broad framework articulating a new and different approach to infusing global learning in the curricula and co-curricula.
- No one course can capture the perspectives of these University Thematic Student Learning Outcomes.
- The existing infrastructure in terms of courses with significant content around the University Thematic Student Learning Outcomes is impressive and therefore offers departments a useful resource from which to draw.
- No comprehensive or immediate realignment of Liberal Studies courses is being sought.
- On the basis of these recommendations, we anticipate that change will occur in a manageable and phased manner over time.
A Further Explication of the Elements of the University Thematic Student Learning Outcomes for Consideration*
Students will gain an appreciation of the interconnectedness and interdependence of the human experience on a global scale. This includes, for example, the following issues:
- the implications of race, racism and ethnocentrism for transnational, human, and societal interaction.
- the relationship among culture, language, community and environment.
- the role of ideology, spirituality, and religion in terms of human action and relationships.
- the interconnectedness between and among political, cultural, personal and economic decisions and the natural world.
- how economic, social, and technological practices and traditions impact climate and the environment.
- how historical, political, religious and economic forces have shaped the current world system and the source of global power inequalities and efforts to address them.
- the roles, possibilities and implications of diverse technologies on culture and the political economy.
Students will appreciate the ubiquity and necessity of diversity in its many manifestations, including cultural, ethnic, religious, linguistic and biological diversity. This includes, for example, the following issues:
- the scope of racial and ethnic diversity both in the US and globally.
- in addition to race and ethnicity, gender, class, sexuality, religion, age, language and disability constitute key dimensions of diversity.
- how ubiquitous racial and ethnic diversity is and how it intersects with other forms of diversity, such as gender, class, sexuality, religion, age, language and disability.
- the relationship between diversity and survival on the planet.
- how the position we take on diversity can either strengthen human communities and sustain the natural environment, or lead to conflict and environmental degradation.
- the role of ethnocentrism and Eurocentrism in human and societal interaction.
Students will appreciate what it means to use natural resources in ethical and responsible ways that maintain a sustainable environment. This includes, for example, the following issues:
- how culture determines how we construct the appropriate use of environmental resources.
- the connection between responsible engagement with the environment and global citizenship.
- the scientific basis of environmental sustainability.
- the vocabulary and concepts around environmental sustainability (e.g., finite and renewable resources, environmental footprint, global commons, peak oil).
- the role of human interactions with the environment and its relation to the root causes of many global problems.
Self and Society
Students will understand the self in terms of identity with community, society and the world. This includes, for example, the following issues:
- one’s own ideology, worldview, cultures and histories: pursue ‘the examined life.’
- the values, beliefs, ideas, and worldview of others.
- oneself and one’s role as a global citizen.
- personal responsibility for global issues that have human rights implications: ethical action.
- recognize how personal actions at the local level can impact global phenomena.
Transcultural and Translingual Competence
Students will develop transcultural and translingual competence. This includes, for example, the following issues:
- the ability to read, speak and write at least one language other than one’s own.
- the ability to have successful interactions with people from cultures other than one’s own.
- in depth knowledge of a culture other than one’s own.
- the ability to communicate through the use of technology.
- how to reconcile/negotiate ambiguities that arise in interactions with others and in their engagement with a range of issues.
* Please note that this information is not intended to be prescriptive
Appendix BRead more
Membership of the Global Learning Subcommittee of the Task Force for Global Education
Dr. Blase Scarnati, Chair, Director of the First Year Seminar, Assoc. Professor of Music
Dr. Sara Aleman, Professor and Director of Ethnic Studies
Dr. Cynthia Anderson, Associate Director of Residence Life
Dr. Joe Anderson, Professor of Business Administration
Dr. Bridget Bero, Assoc. Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering
Dr. Harvey Charles, Vice Provost for International Education
Dr. Chuck Connell, Professor of History
Dr. Brandon Cruickshank, Chair of Chemistry & Biochemistry
Dr. Bill Culbertson, Professor of Health Sciences
Dr. Patrick Deegan, Associate Dean of Distance Learning
Dr. Eck Doerry, Chair, Computer Science
Dr. Marcus Ford, Professor of Humanities, Arts & Religion 8
Dr. Peter Fulé , Assoc. Professor - Ecological Restoration Institute & School of Forestry
Dr. Zsuzsanna Gulacsi, Director of Asian Studies, Assoc. Professor of Humanities, Arts & Religion
Dr. John Hagood, Professor of Mathematics & Statistics
Dr. Michelle Harris, Assoc. Professor of Sociology & Social Work
Dr. Sanjay Joshi, Assoc. Professor of History
Dr. Susan Johnstad, Assistant Dean of Distance Learning
Dr. George Koch, Professor of Biological Sciences
Dr. Debra Larson, Associate Dean of CEFNS
Dr. Rich Lei, Professor of Communications, Chair of the Faculty Senate
Dr. Louise Lockard, Assistant Clinical Professor of Educational Specialties/COE
Dr. Ramona Mellot, Dean of the Graduate College
Dr. Sheila Nair, Professor of Politics and International Affairs
Dr. Bob Neustadt, Coordinator of Latin American Studies Program, Professor of Modern Languages
Dr. Wilbert Odem, Professor & Chair of Civil & Environmental Engineering
Dr. Cecilia Ojeda, Professor & Chair of Modern Languages
Dr. Tom Paradis, Director of the Office of Academic Assessment
Dr. Karen Plager, Professor of Nursing
Dr. Allen Reich, Assoc. Professor of Hotel & Restaurant Management
Dr. Frances Riemer, Director of Women's & Gender Studies Program
Dr. David Schlossberg, Professor of Politics & International Affairs
Dr. Tom Sisk, Professor of Environmental Sciences
Ms. Catherine Talakte, Director of Native American Student Services
Dr. Aregai Tecle, Professor of Forestry
Ms. Georgia Totress, Residence Life-Residence Hall Director
Dr. Tom Uno, Assistant Director, Institute for Human Development
Dr. Miguel Vasquez, Professor of Anthropology
Dr. Michael Vincent, Dean of the College of Arts & Letters